The New World Order of Islam — Page 104
New <mark>World</mark> Order 104 Each <mark>State</mark> will still be responsible only for the poor of its own territories. Again, this system also, would tend to discourage individual talent which, as I have tried to explain, leads to intellectual decline. I am not familiar with the details of the scheme which National Socialism may have put forward or adopted for this purpose. I do know that in Germany a great deal of <mark>State</mark> encouragement is given to capitalists and industrialists who contribute generously towards the social services. I am not aware, however, to what extent the <mark>State</mark> makes itself responsible for individuals or whether by such voluntary means adequate resources become available to the <mark>State</mark>. In any case, the scheme leaves the <mark>State</mark> very much at the mercy of leading capitalists and industrialists. The Bolshevik scheme is that all important industries and commercial enterprises should be run by the <mark>State</mark>, and all surplus wealth whether derived from agriculture or other occupation should be taken over by the <mark>State</mark>. I have already detailed the principal objections to this system. Briefly, it kills individual initiative and is bound in the end to absolutism. The French Revolution tried to set up a people’s Government but only succeeded in producing a tyrant like Napoleon. Conversely, in Russia the Czarist regime produced Bolshevism which appears at the