With Love to Muhammad (sa) - The Khatam-un-Nabiyyin — Page 67
Last Law-bearing Prophet sa 67 discredit the beliefs of the Ahmad ī Muslims and his criticism on this subject is a self-destructive waste as he has no solid ground to stand on. Farhan Khan would do well to learn the adage: People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. Ahmadiyya, the true Isl ā m, only adopted what the saints of the Muslim ummah said as it makes perfect sense. However, it does make one wonder how a person like Farhan Khan, who thinks that he is doing a great favour to Ahmad ī s, the true Muslims, by writing a book, has no knowledge of his own beliefs. His degree of intellect is akin to a person who boastfully cuts the very branch upon which he is sitting. We kindly encourage him to get his facts straight and remind him that it is never too late to learn from one’s own mistakes! It is high time that he learn about his own faith before even thinking about telling others about Ahmadiyya, the Real Isl ā m. Farhan Khan’s Arguments In order to refute the Ahmadiyya Muslim belief in the finality of law-bearing prophethood, Farhan Khan raises three points: 1. The Qur’ ā n does not explicitly state that it is the last book. 2. The argument for non-law-bearing prophethood based on S ū rah An-Nis ā ’4:70 is unacceptable. 3. The word ‘law-bearing’ has been incorrectly inserted to the phrase Kh ā tam-an-Nabiyy ī n. About the first point, it must be noted that Farhan Khan himself forgot about this point altogether when, in the same