A Critical Review of the Pamphlet, 'Fateh-e-Qadian' — Page 41
Matchlessness of I‘J A ZUL-MAS IH 41 The situation is that I was not shown the manuscript of Muhammad H asan separately because, after his death, all his books and papers had been locked away. However, I did see the notes that were written by him on Shams-e-B a zighah and I‘j a zul- Mas ih. They are the same notes which the wicked Golarhv i 21 has copied, he has not written anything of his own merit. Now, the father of Muhammad H asan and some others have become my mortal enemies. They do not show me even a page from these books. Previously, I found an opportunity to see these books when Golarhv i returned the copies — which he had obtained in the past. That was possible only because the man who brought the book back was an outsider. When he lost his way, he came to the mosque and asked me for the directions to the house of Maulav i Muhammad H asan. I asked him his purpose. He said that he was sent by Meher ‘Al i Sh a h to return the books, Shams-e-B a zighah and I‘j a zul-Mas ih to Maulav i Muhammad H asan’s father. Then I looked through the books and saw the notes appended to every page, against each line. I had Saif-e-Chishtiy a ’ i with me so I compared the text with the notes. It was the same, word for word. I would like to do what you have asked for; however Muhammad H asan’s father does not let me have the book. He says that I can only look through them in his presence, and he will not allow me to take them away. I am helpless and cannot do anything about it. I have made a mistake by writing a letter to Golarhv i telling him that he has written nothing at all; what he has done is to copy Muhammad H asan’s notes. Consequently, Golarhv i has written 21 Referring to P i r Meher ‘Al i. [Publishers]