A Critical Review of the Pamphlet, 'Fateh-e-Qadian' — Page 42
42 A critical Review of the Pamphlet—‘f a te h -e-Qadian’ to Muhammad H asan’s father asking him not to show me the notes because I oppose him. Now the dilemma is that Muhammad H asan’s father is a disciple of Golarhv i and follows his commands. I feel truley regretful that I wrote to him, for it is because of this that all have become my enemies. Please forgive me as my coming to Qadian by myself will be an unnecessary expense due to the fact that he does not let me have the books. Humbly, Shah a bud-D i n from Bh ee n , Sub-district Chakwal Concerning this matter, Mi an Shah a bud-D i n also wrote the following letter to Hadrat Maulav i ‘Abdul Kar i m ra , a companion of the Promised Messiah as : Respectful and revered Maulav i ‘Abdul Kar i m ra , Assal a mu ‘alaikum wa ra h matullahi wa barak a tuh u I am enjoying good health and wish the same for you. I would not have declined to come but they do not give me the books, Shams- e-B a zighah and I‘j a zul-Mas ih , which contain the desired notes [of Maulav i Muhammad H asan Fai di of Bheen ]. The harsh tone of Saif-e-Chishtiy a ’ i is mostly of Muhammad H asan. That is why his death. . . was an example. . . . Now that I have written the letter, Golarhv i 22 himself admits his mistake, as is clear from the postcard 22 Referring to P i r Meher ‘Al i Sh a h [Publishers]