The Heavenly Sign — Page 51
BATĀLWİ ŞĀHIB'S CRITICISM OF MY TREATISE, 'ĀSMĀNĪ FAIȘLA': ITS REFUTATION AND SUBSTΑΝΤΙΑΤΙΟΝ WITH DECISIVE HEAVENLY SIGNS On pages 27,50,51,52 of his pamphlet, written in response to Āsmānī Faișla, Shaikh Batālwī has tried his level best to convince the public that my request for a contest, which is in fact a test of faith, which I made to Miāń Nadhīr Hussain of Delhi and his ilk, is unjust. But, anyone who is fair-minded and well informed, can understand that, instead of exonerating himself and his Shaikh of Delhi, his writing has provided further proof that they have no intention whatsoever of turning to the truth or getting rid of their satanic suspicions. Everyone can learn by reading the Edict of Disbelief by the Shaikh, that he and Nadhīr Hussain have issued this edict with absolute conviction and full faith and have persistently charged me with disbelief and heresy. They have dubbed me as Dajjal, the misled one and an infidel. In response to all this, I have explained time and again the purpose of my books and the fact that they do not contain a single sentence which implies heresy. I do not claim to be a Prophet, nor do I say that I am not part of the Muslim Umma, nor do I deny 51