Truth Prevails — Page xix
( xiii ) Section of the Ahmadies, there seems to be no one who really believes in the real Islamic Khatm-i Nabuwwat. ” ( Paigham-i-Sulha , October 11, 1944 ) Earlier, in 1941, Maulvi Mohammad Ali had stated his belief in principle in the following words: “Without doubt, I hold that anyone who denies Khatm-i-Nabuwwat , he is irreligious, and out of the pale of Islam. ” ( Paigham-i-Sulha , January 27, 1941) In the presence of this quotation we are fully justified in holding this logical conclusion that in the eyes of Maulvi Mohammad Ali, with the exception of the Lahore Section of Ahmadies, all other reciters of the Kalima are outside the pale of Islam. We wonder how Mr. Faruqi would adjust his views in the face of this clear statement by Maulvi Mohammad Ali ? 8. Maulvi Mohammad Ali, and his friends, have repudiated the Khilafat of the second Successor of the Promised Messiah; but during his Amart, the Lahore Section elected three Khalifas, in the sense acceptable in their eyes, namely, Maulvi Ghulam Husain of Peshawar, Syed Hamid Shah of Sialkot, and Khawaja Kamaluddin. ( Paigham-i-Sulha , March 24, 1914) The first two, out of this trio, accepted the Khilafat of Hazrat Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud Ahmad, while Khawaja Kamaluddin cut his mission in Woking, England, clean from any control by the Ahmadiyya Isha’at-i-Islam, Lahore. ( Paigham-i-Sulha , January 27, 1931, page 6, column 2) Toward the close of his life, Khawaja Kamaluddin saw in a dream what he has himself described as follows : “In front of the throne was a room where the accused had to stand in the dock… Maulvi Mohammad Ali was with me… It appeared there was some case against us, we were present in the court as the accused, facing trial. I understood there was decision from the throne of the Almighty, which Hazrat Mirza Sahib rose to announce, though he too seemed to be in the grip of fear. But he announced the verdict, in a voice full of anger. ” Khawaja Kamaluddin published this dream in his book, entitled Mojaddid-i-Kamil , and raised some objections against the way affairs of the Anjuman Isha’at-i-Islam, Lahore, was functioning, which drew a long reply from Maulvi Mohammad Ali. ( Paigham-i-Sulha. January, 27, 1931) May I beg to ask, Mr. Faruqui, if these eight points, I have here touched upon, constitute a sign of your victory? Despair of the Lahore Section Now I come to the end of this Foreword, on a note of despair discernable