Truth About the Split — Page 90
90 presence of Khwaja Kamaluddin, Maulawi Muhammad Ali and Maulawi Muhammad Ahsan. They had particular reason for being present at the time, as my speech was to be followed by the reading of the Annual Report of the Sadr Anjuman Ahmadiyya and the appeal for contributions, and they were all members of the Anjuman. Thus, it would appear that none of them could plead want of knowledge of my views on the subject of the Promised Messiah’s as prophethood. From the above it should also be evident that all my writings from the year 1906 to December 1910 go to prove that I had all along believed the Promised Messiah as to be a Nabi. Later on, in March 1911, I wrote an article on the status of those who did not believe in the Promised Messiah as. This was published in the April issue of the Tashhidhul Adhhan and in the Badr of 4th May 1911, and Al-Hakam of 14th May 1911. This was followed by a long succession of writings and lectures on the subject, knowledge of which has not been denied and cannot be denied even by Maulawi Muhammad Ali. In the light of the above facts, I would now ask every fair-minded reader to say whether it could be said or even imagined that the influence of