Truth About Ahmadiyyat — Page 75
75 brothers. (Lujjatun Nur, p. 61) By way of illustration of the type of language used against the Promised Messiah we set out one specimen out of hundreds. Maulvi Muhammad Hussain of Batala described him as a secret enemy of Islam, a second Masailmah , Anti - Christ, confirmed liar, black - faced. He said: A rope should be drawn around his neck and he should be decked out with a garland of shoes round his neck and should in this condition be paraded in the cities of India. He is a satan, evil - doer, wicked, shameless, worse than Anti - Christ, a descendant of H ulaqui. (Ishaatus Sunnah) Confronted with hundreds of such abusive and offensive declarations, if the Promised Messiah, peace be on him, set up a mirror before their authors by way of illustrating their low morals, how is he to be blamed? He made no false charge against them, nor did he abuse them but only applied to them in its true import the prophecy that the Holy Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, had made concerning them. Let us now examine the specific charges of defamation and abuse of the divines which have been urged against the Promised Messiah, peace be on him. It is objected that he castigated the divines by applying to them the expression zurrayatul baghaya which, it is alleged, means `the progeny of prostitutes’. The sentence from which this term is taken occurs in “ Ayena Kamalat Islam” and runs as follows: