The True Islamic Concept of Jihad — Page 4
[ 4 ] which he appeared not to have a single sympathiser in the entire world. If the British did force the Promised Messiah as to make such claims, then how realistic could their expectations possibly be that people would actually listen to him? This amounts to saying that the British appointed the Promised Messiah as for the abrogation of jihad , yet they asked him to make claims that resulted in a situation where even people who had minimal contact with him were turned against him. Such a contradictory argument can possibly be conceived by people who are involved in the vehement opposition of Ahmadiyyat, but no rational person in the world can agree with it. It amounts to saying that the British had their own god killed 4 through the hands of the Promised Messiah as. Simultaneously, by causing the Promised Messiah as to make a claim of ummati [within the followers of the Holy Prophet sa ] Prophethood, they caused all Muslims to become his enemies. Also by allowing him to make unconventional claims regarding the life of B a b a N a nak, they turned the entire Sikh population that lived in his own Punjab into his enemies. They turned the entire A ry a Sam a j into his enemies, along with all the followers of 4. This is a reference to Christianity’s deification of Jesus Christ as and the Promised Messiah’s as claim that Jesus as died a natural death.