Three in One — Page 323
of misunderstanding the true meaning of the prophecy?. It is an acknowledged fact that while the noble consorts of. Hadhrat Muhammadsa measured the lengths of their hands to determine which of them would be the first to join him after his death, the prophecy indicated that the wife who was most forthcoming in charity would be the first to die after him. The truth of the actual revelation vouchsafed unto Hadhrat. Muhammadsa was, therefore, proven when Hadhrat Zainabra, who had been the most charitable of his wives became the first of his consorts to die after him. This is a testimony of the fact that it was not the revelation of Hadhrat Muhammad sa which proved to be incorrect but the understanding of its true meaning. And, this is exactly what Hadhrat Ahmad as stated in the passage in Izalah Auham which Abdul Hafeez has so dishonestly manipulated to establish his false charge that he,. God forbid, stated that the revelations of Hadhrat Muhammad turned out to be incorrect. In fact, had this pir from Gujjo exercised honesty in his study of Izalah Auham, he may have discovered that within the context of this discussion Hadhrat. Ahmadas declared: 'However, all these incidence indicate that the apostles of God can also make errors in understanding the meaning or in the interpretation of prophecies. As far as the words of the revelation are concerned, these are without a doubt positively true. But, in matters concerning religion and faith, there is absolutely no possibility of an error. ' 149. Is it not dishonest of Abdul Hafeez to even infer from this passage of Hadhrat Ahmad'sas Izalah Auham that he ever made any such statement to the effect that God forbid, the revelations vouchsafed to Hadhrat Muhammadsa, became wrong. 7. In his seventh charge, the author of Two in One accuses. Hadhrat Ahmadas for having stated that 'revelation did not 49. Ahmad, [Hadhrat] Mirza Ghulam. Izalah Auham, p. 690; Ruhani Khazain, vol 3, p. 472 323