Three in One — Page 185
RIDICULE OF REVELATIONS. In discussing the question of him being the Muhammadean. Messiah in the likeness of the Mosaic Messiah, Hadhrat Mirza. Ghulam Ahmad as stressed that the 'similarity of the two orders needed to be established' so that 'an accord may be proven between the two Messiah of their respective dispensations. 1265 It is therefore not surprising that while the Pharisees of the first age accused Hadhrat Jesus as of being assisted by the ruler of. Satans 266, those of Hadhrat Ahmad's as age also insinuate the same in relation to him and allege that the source of his revelation was, God forbid, satanic. 267 Therefore, while one need not state more in relation to this obnoxious charge against. Hadhrat Ahmadas, for the benefit of those who sincerely wish to know the truth, one cites the opinion expressed by the then leader of the Ahle Hadeeth who witnessed the life and works of. Hadhrat Ahmadas and consequently stated in relation to the revelations received by him: 'It is well known that Satanic suggestions are mostly false but not one of the revelations received by the author of Braheen e Ahmadiyya has been proved false up to this day. These cannot therefore be considered Satanic suggestions. Can any. Muslim follower of the Quran believe that Satan can be given knowledge, like the Prophets and angels, of that which is hidden so that not one of his disclosures of the hidden should lack truth?'268. Maulvi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi did not have the occasion to meet this pseudo pir of Gujjo or else he would not have had the occasion to ask the question if any Muslim could believe that Satan can be given the knowledge like the prophets and the 265. Ahmad, [Hadhrat] Mirza Ghulam. Tadhkiratush Shahadatain, English Ed. pgs. ,8 & 28 266. Matthew 12. 25/26 267. Shah, Syed Abdul Hafeez, Two in One, pgs. 11 & 41 268. Batalvi, Maulvi Muhammad Hussain. Ishaatas Sunnah, vol. vii. No. , 6,1884, p. 170 185