Refutation of the Doctrine of Transmigration — Page 29
Refutation of the Doctrine of Trasmigration 29 But the believers of transmigration insinuate all their benefactors as sinners and evil. In fact, they ride on them and even consider their acts of adultery and homosexuality justifiable. Because, as they believe, if their benefactors do not commit sin, how can they pass through a w a - gawan and the cycle of birth and death? But passing through the cycle of birth and death is a must, proving that they were committed to sinfulness. The Muslims, on the other hand, believe in the innocence of the Prophets, may peace be upon them. The objections Christians and Jewish historians level against the Muslims are because either they have been misled or they deliberately try to mislead others. Thirtieth Answer— We ask Aryas who follow Pandit Dayanand whether their saints and divines were and are pious and righteous or sinful and evil? If they were and are pious and righteous and are free from evil, they should acquire eternal sal - vation and never again pass through the process of a w a - gawan , which is an abode of punishment and Hell. Then others would become your benefactors, mentors, and spiritual guides, and they, too, would acquire salvation. Consequently, the cycle of limited souls would end within a limited period, and there would remain no wherewithal for God to create the universe (God forbid). In the second case, if they are not pious and righteous, none of them are trustworthy. After all, who can trust a sinful person! Thirty-First Answer— I have personally heard from Rajahs and Maharajahs—and indeed, that is what is enunciated by the belief in transmigration—that after observing laborious and stren - uous worship, someone becomes a Rajah, and that rule eventually