With Love to Muhammad (sa) - The Khatam-un-Nabiyyin — Page 82
82 With Love to Muhammad sa the Kh ā tam-un-Nabiyy ī n connotation of Kh ā tam-un-Nabiyy ī n , but the descent of Jesus as from heaven would certainly change it. 73 Based on personal communication with Farhan Khan, we know that he has read the book quoted above several times. Although impossible, it would have been more appropriate for him to at least try to refute the argument and logic given in the above quotation instead of picking arguments derived from the insight of individual Ahmad ī s and refuting those. His example is like a pigeon who closes his eyes in hopes that the cat disappears, when in reality the cat is right in front of him and is about to make a meal out of him! Closing his eyes to the flawless logic of the Ahmadiyya Muslim beliefs does not mean that it will go away!! Distinction between Law-Bearing and Non-Law-Bearing Prophets Under the section entitled No Firm Basis for the Distinction Between Law-Bearing vs. Non-Law-Bearing Prophet , Farhan Khan tries to refute the Ahmadiyya Muslim belief in a distinction between law-bearing and non-law-bearing prophets by presenting the following argument: The crux of the refutation of this argument lays in an important distinction between the methods All ā h employs to communicate with his prophets. What is known from the Qur’ ā n is that All ā h sent inspiration (wahi) to all of the Prophets, but did not necessarily speak (kalama) to them all. 73 A Misconception Removed, Hazrat Mirz ā Ghul ā m Ahmad as , (Isl ā mabad, Isl ā m International Publications Ltd. , 2007), Pages 3-5