With Love to Muhammad (sa) - The Khatam-un-Nabiyyin — Page 78
78 With Love to Muhammad sa the Kh ā tam-un-Nabiyy ī n Then, Farhan Khan goes on to demonstrate the same faulty logic in what he alleges is the Ahmadiyya Muslim belief: [No more laws] + [No more Prophets] = X [No more laws] + [No more Prophets] = [No more laws] + [No more Prophets] [No more laws] + [No more Prophets] = [No more] * ( [laws] + [Prophets] ) [No more laws] + [No more Prophets] = [No more laws and no more Prophets] (The final statement can be rewritten as [no more laws or Prophets]) Once again, Farhan Khan proves how well he wastes time on a false premise. Had he taken the time to understand what he was criticizing before he criticized it, he could have saved himself a lot of time and embarrassment. First, as stated earlier, we need to emphasize that the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jam ā ‘at does not believe that 33:41 states that there can be “no more prophets. ” If an Ahmad ī Muslim made this argument, it is his or her personal opinion and the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jam ā ‘at does not bear responsibility for the personal opinions of those who have a weak understanding of its beliefs. The correct logic of the Ahmadiyya Muslim beliefs is presented in the same style as above for the purpose of clarity: This is a simple way to describe the Ahmadiyya Muslim belief and this understanding cannot be refuted. It is no wonder why Farhan Khan chose not to refute the above belief and sought help from the unique insight of individual Ahmad ī s !