Life of Ahmad — Page 577
as RIGHTEOUS INDIGNATION 577 By giving quotations from these books 139 Ahmad as showed that whatever he had written was as nothing compared with the vile attacks made by his enemies. Whatever he had written was only in defence. And it goes to his credit that his writings, however, unpalatable and harsh they might have seemed to the corrupt and diseased hearts of his enemies, were 139 1. D a fi‘ul Buht a n , by Rev. Mr. Ranklin, Mission Press, Allahabad 1845. 2. Mas ih ud Dajj a l , Rev. R a m Chand, 1873. 3. S i ratul Mas ih , Rev. Thakar D a s, American Presbyterian Mission. Sialkot. 1882. 4. Andr u na’-e-Bible by Rev. Abdullah A thim. 5. Taw a r i kh k a Ijm a l , by Rev. William, Christian Mission Rewari, 1891. 6. Review Br a h i n-e-Ahmadiyya , Rev. Thakar D a s, Mission Press, Ludhiana. 7. Urdu Translation of Washington Irving’s Life of Muhammad , by Rulya R a m Gholat i , Arorbans Press, Lahore. 8. The N u r Afsh a Ĕ Ludhiana, 1896. 9. Taft i shul Islam , Rev. Rogers, 1870. 10. Nab i ’-e-Ma‘ su m , American Mission Press, Ludhiana, 1884. 11. Hid a yatul Muslim i n and other writings of Rev. Im a d-ud-D i n. His first book Ta h q i qul Imam was written in 1866. 12. P a d a sh-e-Islam —Indarman, Muradabad, 1866. 13. Saty a rath Park a sh —Pt. Day a nand, Kishan Chand Co. Press, 1884. 14. Nuskha Khabt-e-Ahmadiyya , Pt. Lekhr a m Peshawari, 1888. 15. Takdh i b Br a h i n-e-Ahmadiyya , Pt. Lekhr a m, Chashma’-i-N u r Press, Amritsar, 1890. 16. Sab u t-e-Tan a sukh , Pt. Lekhr a m, Muf i d ‘ A m Press, Lahore, 1895. 17. Khabt i Qadiani K a ‘Il a j , by Rajinder Singh, Editor Kh a lsa Bah a dur , Guru Gubind Singh Press, 1897. 18. T a ’ i d-e- A sm a n i , by Munshi Muhammad Jafar, Thanesri, 1892. Munshi R a ma of Gurukula has made an abortive effort to vindicate the obnoxious vituperation of the A rya Sam a j in a book entitled The A rya Sam a j and its Detractors ( Dayanandabd 28, 1910) by giving quotations from the writings of the enemies of Islam like Washington Irving. But he, very conveniently, forgets that a transgressor cannot exonerate himself by citing the example of fellow-transgressors.