Did Jesus Redeem Mankind?

by Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad

Page 106 of 184

Did Jesus Redeem Mankind? — Page 106

106 one another but seek it not of the One God, they can never believe. "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent" (John, Ch. 17:3). . One more point has been clarified here. The Christians could argue out the quotation from St. John (Ch. 5:44) with a specious answer that in their vocabulary the One God stands for tripartite godhead which comprises God the Father,. God the Son and God the Holy Ghost; and they claim that "three are one and one is three. " They could very well say that God stands for a composite of God the Father, God the. Son and God the Holy Ghost. The above-quoted reference from St. John has repudiated this stand, for, the Messiah is mentioned in it as distinct from the Only True God. The words are: "And this is life eternal, that they might know Thee, the only true God and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. " Here the "only true God" is an expression used distinct from Messiah; he is not included in it. It is evident, therefore, that “the only true God" is distinct from Messiah and not in conjunction with him. Tauhid, i. e. , Unity of God, means in truth. His exclusiveness-that none be associated with Him, neither the Son, nor the Holy Ghost, nor aught else. 多多. In short, this quotation makes it clear that the word 'Son' is a metaphoric expression used by the Messiah; it did not carry the sense that he was a partner with God. It was, on the contrary, an expression the like of which people are wont to use in respect of their sons, as, for instance, they would call them the apples of their eyes. As men have a right to use terms of endearment, so has God the right to use terms of endearment, in respect of His servants. It happens very often that one is tempted to call a friend's child son. It never