Was Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat Planted By The British? — Page 38
Was Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama'at Planted by the British? 38 second aspect of this topic in my next Friday sermon. I have left out the mention of many references, but still, the nature of these topics is such as will prolong the duration of Friday sermons. So it is not necessary that I should deal with a topic at length and finish it during the same Friday sermon. Several minor topics may, however, be treated in the same sermon. I estimate this series to be completed in about a couple of months. ) To sum it up, as far as the matter of praising the British and the allegation of being ' khud k a shta pauda of the British' is concerned, our Jam a ‘at must now know this subject inside out. The Promised Messiah as never even vaguely hinted at the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jam a ‘at when he employed the phrase, ' khud k a shta pauda of the British'. Rather, his ancestral family with reference to whom he used this descriptive phrase, consisted of an assortment of Sunnis and Ahl-e- H ad i th individuals. And even in regard to them, he did not use the expression with reference to their religion but used it in respect of the family as such. Then again, it is a hundred percent established fact that this family did not benefit financially at all from the British. Instead, the British government proved to be one which confiscated the family property. As for the accusers, their tongues are utterly unrestrained and they have no fear of God. In addition to accusing certain other sects as ' khud k a shta pauda of the British', they continue to allege the same against the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jam a ‘at. They have so deeply fallen in love with this expression that they