Ahmadis and the Aryas of Qadian — Page 38
38 Shrampat went back home and changed the name of his son and, instead of Ameen Chand, named him Gokal Chand who is still alive today—though my brother passed away a few days later. Furthermore, it ought to be enquired of Lala Shrampat under oath, that is it not true that when an in - dividual of Gurdaspur called Karam Deen registered a defamation case against me in the court of Atma Raam, Extra Assistant, I had said to Lala Shrampat that God has informed me that, eventually, I would be exonerated in this lawsuit but Karam Deen would face punishment. This news was from such a time when all indications were opposed to this outcome and the opinion of the judge was against me. Thus, did Atma Raam – who was deciding the case – when passing the verdict did so with much harshness and fined me seven hundred rupees. Furthermore, he tried his utmost to record this verdict. Then from the department of the Divisional Judge, as I had prophesied, the ruling of Atma Raam was overturned and the above-mentioned gentleman, acquitting me with great respect, wrote in his Ameen Chand, since the Hindu people shorten Ameen Chand to امی [ami] as well. This produced a lot of fear in his heart and return - ing home he named his son Gokal Chand instead of Ameen Chand. (Author)