Truth About the Split

by Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad

Page 29 of 430

Truth About the Split — Page 29

29 deem it legitimate to insert his name in the formula of the creed. But it has suited his purpose thus deliberately and intentionally to accuse me of something of which he knows me to be perfectly innocent. Right Application of Analogy Now, with regard to this remarkable gentleman (Muhammad Zahiruddin, vide pages 12-17 of The Split ) and his relations in a certain place, he writes about me as follows: "The said Miya ń Sahib (referring to me) regards the Promised Messiah as as a Nabi and a Rasul , who brought no new law and followed the law of a previous Prophet, and shrinks from practically following the commands and prohibitions contained in the Promised Messiah’s as revelations, and refuses to regard the Promised Messiah as , agreeably to the purport of his writings, as a Nabi and continues to persist in his mistaken views. " At another place he writes: "Contrary to the opinion held by the whole of the Ahmadiyya Community, it is my belief that the Promised Messiah as not only made the people acknowledge him to be a Prophet without a law, but did clearly make a claim of being a Prophet with a new law. " About the