Truth About the Split — Page 198
198 discussion are now quoted: "The Promised Messiah as has called himself Ahmad, and said that it was he who was the real object of the prophecy, because he said that in this passage (the verse Ismuhu Ahmad in Chapter Al-Saff of the Holy Quran), there is a prophecy concerning Ahmad, alone, whereas the Holy Prophet was both Ahmad and Muhammad. " ( Al- Qaulul Fasl , page 27). Again, I wrote on page 31, "The person who is referred to in Ismuhu Ahmad is the Promised Messiah as. " In short, in six pages of the book I proved by quotations from the writings of the Promised Messiah as and the testimony of Khalifatul Masih I ra , that the Promised Messiah as was the real object of the Quranic prophecy concerning Ahmad. Regarding the question of Kufr of non-Ahmadis, I wrote on page 33 of the book, "The other question discussed by Khwaja Sahib is that of Kufr of non- Ahmadis. Regarding this question, I have already published the writings of the Promised Messiah as which have a bearing on the subject. Further explanation is unnecessary. My belief continues to be the same as before. " Below in a footnote, it was noted 'For details, see Tashhidhul Adhhan for April 1911. ' This was the number in which was published my article running over 40 pages on the subject of Kufr of non-Ahmadis, from which several extracts have