Truth About the Split — Page 119
119 that the book Nabiyyullah Ka Zahur did not provide the ground for expulsion for had it been so, the oldest organ of the Movement, while dwelling on the story of the expulsion, could not have expressed itself in such glowing terms in appreciation of the book. But in addition to the above, there is yet another consideration which proves the groundlessness of the allegation made by Maulawi Muhammad Ali. This is that while, according to Maulawi Muhammad Ali, it was the book Nabiyyullah Ka Zahur which was the ground for the expulsion of Zahiruddin, it remains to be explained why I was not similarly expelled on the ground of what I wrote on the subject of Kufr of those who had not accepted the Promised Messiah as , especially as what I wrote was, according to Maulawi Muhammad Ali, founded on the doctrine of Nubuwwat taught by Zahiruddin, although as a matter of fact my article had been published before Zahiruddin’s book, and had been read in its entirety by Khalifatul Masih I ra , himself? I feel sure that a consideration of the whole evidence—internal and external—will force upon every judicious reader the conviction that Maulawi Muhammad Ali has knowingly and intentionally attempted to compile a false history of the Movement