Three in One — Page 332
Rasul e Karimsa is not the last and final prophet'81 - suggesting that he denied Hadhrat Muhammad sa as the Khataman. Nabiyeen. Yet, neither on the stated pages nor in any of his works did Hadhrat Ahmadas ever make any such statement which could even remotely be construed to suggest the denial of the Seal of Prophethood. On the contrary, his works are full of statements to the effect that he acknowledges the Prophet of. Islams as Khataman Nabiyyeen and Abdul Hafeez has himself cited Hadhrat Ahmadas as having stated that he believed. Hadhrat Muhammadsa to be the Final Prophet. ' 82. Incidentally, while Hadhrat Ahmadas is accused of this false charge, according to Abdul Hafeez's spiritual son and the driving force behind this constant tirade against Ahmadi. Muslim, Dr. Rashid Ali, the pir of Gujjo has claimed to be. Hadhrat Ilyasas. But, on account of the requirements of the. Constitutional Amendment 260, he has not made a public announcement of it. Now, unless the author of Two in One wishes to deny any such claim by him, and thereby prove Dr. . Rashid Ali to be a liar, what opinion would he express in relation to himself, in terms of his understanding of the expression Khataman Nabiyeen? 19. The nineteenth allegation made against Hadhrat Mirza. Ghulam Ahmad as refers to the question of the day of. Resurrection. In this instance, he is stated to have declared on page 2 of Izalah Auham that 'Qiyamah or the Resurrection day is nothing and there is no such thing as destiny. 183 However, when this page is consulted, one finds that he stated: خدا تعالیٰ سے ڈرو اور اپنی زبانوں کو تکفیر سے تھام لو خدا تعالیٰ خوب جانتا ہے کہ میں ایک مسلمان ہوں۔ أمنت بالله وملئكته وكتبه ورسله والبحث بعد الموت واشهران لا اله الا الله وحده لا شريك له واشهد ان محمدا عبده ورسوله فاتقوا الله ولا تقولو الست مسلما و اتقوا الملك الذي اليه ترجعون . 81. Shah, Syed Abdul Hafeez. Two in One, p. 51 332 82. Ibid. , p. 49 83. Ibid. , p. 51