Three in One

by Naeem Osman Memon

Page 309 of 363

Three in One — Page 309

1. The first of these alleged statements he accuses Hadhrat. Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas of having made is that in Izalah. Auham, page 128 he stated that 'Prophet Muhammadsa understood the meaning of Surah Zilzal incorrectly. " However, when Hadhrat Ahmad'ssa original work is checked, it establishes that he never made any such alleged statement, either on page 128 of Izalah Auham or its entire text or for that matter any of his writings. The passage of Izalah Auham which Abdul Hafeez cites to establish his false charge does not itself make any such statement. One cites here, Abdul Hafeez's own citation of the passage which he claims may be found on page 128 of Izalah. Auham. He states that: 'Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani says: Our religious scholars have given a literal meaning of this Surah that earth will face severe earthquakes in the last days and it will be of such severity that the whole earth will become upside down and that what will be inside will come out. And human beings i. e. : - disbelievers [Kafira] will ask the earth what has happened to it. So that day earth will talk and tell its condition. These meanings and explanations are entirely wrong. . As evident from this citation of the passage, the people who are stated to have misunderstood the meaning of Surah Zilzal are the religious scholars who have given this Surah a literal meaning. Now, and unless Abdul Hafeez wishes to argue that these religious scholars were collectively, God forbid, Prophet. Muhammadsa, his allegation against Hadhrat Ahmad as stands refuted. . It being established that Hadhart Ahmadas never made any such statement in relation to Prophet Muhammadsa which Abdul. Hafeez falsely alleges he did, one now turns to the validity of the grounds on which the author of Two in One makes such a false inference. He states that the meaning and explanation of. Surah Zilzal which in Hadhrat Ahmad's as is incorrect: 5. Ibid. , p. 50 6. Ibid. 309 7. Ibid.