Three in One — Page 204
Muqadimah Haqeeqatul Islam is concerned, the complete verse has been noted therein as: قدرت کے برخلاف ہے کہ وہ شیاطین کو انکے مواضع مناسبہ سے معطل کردیے۔ اللہ ملکشان، قرآن کریم میں فرماتا ہے وما ارسلنا من قبلك من رسول ولا نبي الا اذا تمنى القى الشيطان في امنيته نينسخ الله ما يلقى الشيطان ثم يحكم الله آیا تہ واللہ علیہ حکیم ہے یعے ہم نے کوئی ایسا رسول. PHOTOCOPY OF QURANIC VERSE 22. 52, DAFE WASWAS, MUQADIMAH. HAQEEQATUL ISLAM, AYANAE KAMALAT E ISLAM, RUHANI KHAZAIN, VOL. 5, P. 352 i. e. , 'Wa maaa 'arsalnaa minqablika mir-rasuulinwwa laa nabiyyin 'illaaa 'izaa tamannaaa 'alqash - Shaytaanu fiii 'umniyyatih: fayansakhullaahu maa yulqish - Shaytaanu summa yuh-kimullaahu 'Aayaatih: wallaahu 'Aliimun Hakiim' which is exactly how it has been recorded in the Quran. . Incidentally, it is argued that in this verse, the word minqablika before Wa maaa 'arsalnaa has been expunged because if this word had remained there, it would have made it impossible for. Hadhrat Ahmad as to establish his own claim to prophethood. ". However, if as alleged, Hadhrat Ahmadas had expunged the word minqablika to assist him in establishing his claim to prophethood, then may one ask Abdul Hafeez as to why did he not expunge it in every citation of the Quranic verse recorded by him in his books, as for instance, it is to be found in the very first edition of Braheen e Ahmadiyya. 18 Moreover, one is rather at a loss to understand how the word minqablika, meaning, before thee not being cited in this verse effects Hadhrat Ahmad's ªs claim to prophethood. It is an established fact of history that apostles of God have, as a rule, been opposed by Satan and hence God. Almighty stated in the Quran: as 'Never did We send a Messenger or a Prophet before thee but when he recited [the Message] Satan proposed [opposition] in respect of that which he recited thereof. But 17. Ibid. 18. Ahmad, [Hadhrat] Mirza Ghulam. Braheen Ahmadiyya, f/n. p. 549 204