Three in One — Page 130
then one would ask him to explain the Quranic passage in relation to Hadhrat Moses'sas encounter with someone whom he sought to follow only on the condition: 'that thou teach me something of the [Higher] Truth which thou hast been taught?'47. Is this passage of the Holy Quran not, to a larger majority of. Muslim scholars, evidence of Hadhrat Moses as receiving education from another person? What then could be so objectionable about Hadhrat Ahmad as being a recipient of education from another person?. The author of Two in One may have had his own reasons for quoting a summary only of this passage from Kitabul Bariyyah and expunging a large number of sentences found in Hadhrat. Ahmad's original statement. But, to the author of the present publication, it appears to be an act of God which caused this pir from Gujjo to dishonestly summarise this statement of Hadhrat. Ahmadas and thereby expose Abdul Hafeez as a liar. This is indicated by the fact that within the text of this summary, he states that Hadhrat Ahmad as wrote: 'I was employed for a few years by the British Government in. Sialkot court as a clerk for Rs. 15/- per month" 148. The fact is that whereas in this original statement from whence this statement is claimed to have been cited, Hadhrat Ahmadas did allude to his employment with the British Government, he did not specify, either the department he worked in nor the position he held or even the salary which he received during his employment. " Hence, this pir from Gujjo has been exposed as a liar yet once again. All praise belongs to Allah! 47. Al Quran 18. 67 48. Shah, Syed Abdul Hafeez. Two in One, p. 8 49. Ahmad. [Hadhrat] Mirza Ghulam. Kitabul Bariyyah, pp. 166/167; Ruhani Khazain, vol. 13, pp. 184/85 130