Three in One — Page 105
then after 10 months he was delivered from his own uterus as. Jesus, son of Mary. What a logic! The whole building of. Qadianism is founded on this ridiculous idea. Everybody can well imagine what sort of religion it is. '³. In the first instance it should be observed that according to this hostile citation itself, Hadhrat Ahmadas did not claim that he was made Mary as allegedly stated by the author of Two in One but that he was named Mary. What could be so objectionable about a person being named Mary by God and why should this be considered ridiculous when the Holy Quran categorises believers into two categories, those like Assiya, the wife of. Pharaoh and those like Hadhrat Maryas. It states: 'And God sets forth as an example to those who believe, the wife of Pharaoh: Behold she said: O my Lord! build for me in nearness to Thee, a mansion in the garden and save me from. Pharaoh and his doings, and save me from those that do wrong. And Mary daughter of Imran, who guarded her chastity; and We breathed into [her body] of Our spirit; and she testified to the truth of the words of her Lord and of his. Revelations, and was one of the devout [servants]. "4. What then is so ridiculous about being named Mary when all believers are, without exception likened to either of these two women and Hadhrat Ahmadas being of the higher order of believers was named by God as Mary - Hadhrat Maryas being the higher order of the believers known to the language of the. Holy Quran?. Now, if Abdul Hafeez should consider it ridiculous that he, personally, be named Mary as he considers Hadhrat Ahmadas being named after her a ridiculous idea, then maybe he would not object to being called Assiya, the second category of believers known to the Quran. However, if he considers being named Assiya a ridiculous idea also, then his only option would 3. Ibid. 4. Al Quran 66. 11. 12. English Translation, Abdullah Yusuf Ali, pp. 1573/74 105