Three in One — Page 33
eyes. Muslims desecrate the grave of Hadhrat Ahmadas, one submits that the challenger, first open the grave of any one of the people considered shaheeds by him to establish the validity of his claim. The definition of a shaheed which he offers in his book is 'those who die in the way of God'% and since his ancestors were hereditary pirs of Gujjo, one would assume that according to him, they must have died in the way of Allah. Why does. Abdul Hafeez then not open the grave of any one of his ancestors whom he considers died in the way of Allah and let the world see if his body 'is fresh and appears alive and if his eyes are open and rays of light coming out of his eyes blind the of the watchers' - a state in which he believes the bodies of the shaheed's are preserved. " He has spent a colossal amount of time and effort as well as money in writing this obnoxious book. Two in One to prove to the world that Ahmadi Muslims are disbelievers and his mureed Dr. Syed Rashid Ali is draining his finances to post his grotesque publication Al Fatwa as well as nasty audios to hundreds of Ahmadi Muslims to hammer his beliefs and opinions? Why should Abdul Hafeez go through all this effort and cause his mureeds so much expense if he can prove the truth of his claim by just doing what he proposes. Ahmadi Muslims do to prove the truthfulness of their stand?. After all, it is his belief that such preservation of the bodies of those who die in the way of God is essentially true. . If on the other hand, he does not consider any of his ancestors to have spent a life worthy of being considered to be amongst those whose bodies are preserved, then one suggests that he exhume the body of the latest shaheed of his ummah - Zia ul. Haq buried at what has now come to be popularly known as. Gabra Chawk in Islamabad, Pakistan and demonstrate to the world that his body is preserved with all its limbs. If he can substantiate this naive belief of the preservation of bodies through any such actual proof then he might just have cause to demand similar proof of others. . Abdul Hafeez's attempts to prove his belief in relation to this 96. Shah, Syed Abdul Hafeez. Two in One, p. 19 33 97. Ibid.