Three in One — Page 307
However, if Abdul Hafeez had not been a liar, his prediction written before the date of the receipt of this Eid card at the. London Mosque, i. e. , the 30th of April, 1992 should have come to fruition in April, 1993, at the latest. But, with the grace of. God Almighty, that was not to be so which is an evidence of the fact that Hadhrat Mirza Tahir Ahmaday and the Ahmadiyya. Muslim Community are on the truth while Syed Abdul Hafeez. Shah, the pir of Gujjo and the administrator of the Bait ul. Mukarram Trust in Pakistan as well as the spiritual guide and teacher of Dr. Syed Rashid Ali of Dibba, al Fujairah in the. United Arab Emirates is a personified liar because his prediction has been proven to be false. Thus, in accordance with his own prayer that 'if he is wrongly accusing the Ahmadiyya Muslim. Community or writing his book for worldly gains, then. Allah trap the liar and the accuser with His curse and reveal such signs as will decide between the truth and falsehood, 194 Abdul. Hafeez has been caused by God Almighty to be exposed as a liar with this prediction. Yet, he has the audacity to take exception to the appellation of a liar being stated on the cover page of the Mubahala challenge issued by the Ahmadiyya. Muslim Community. Does this prediction of Abdul Hafeez which did not come to fruition as predicted by the pir of Gujjo not make him deserving of the appellation of a liar? Why should he then take exception be being called one when the description aptly applies to him? Or else, how does he explain the non fulfilment of his prophecy, which, according to his own statement was supposed to illustrate the falsehood of Hadhrat. Mirza Tahir Ahmaday and the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community? 93. vide. Two in One, p. 67 94. Ibid. 307