Three in One — Page 295
the two parties to the debate, the one who was deliberately following falsehood and forsaking the true God and deifying a weak mortal would be thrown into hell within fifteen months, each month corresponding to each day of the debate, and that he would suffer open disgrace if he did not turn to the truth; and that the one who is following the truth and believed in the true God would be openly honoured. 160. In conclusion to this announcement, Hadhrat Ahmadas directed a personal question at Abdullah Athim and enquired: 'Now I ask Deputy Sahib. If this sign is fulfilled, would you accept it as a perfect and divine prophecy according to your liking? Would it not be a strong proof that the Holy Prophetsa, whom you called the Dadjaal in your book Androoni Bible, is a true Prophet. 161. This introduction to the debate between Hadhrat Ahmadas and. Abdullah Athim should establish the fact that the purpose of the entire exercise was to establish the superiority of one of the two contending religions, Islam or Christianity. Hadhrat Ahmad's as final announcement at the close of the debate is also indicative of the fact that the test was not between personalities but between Islam and Christianity, the respective faiths of the persons involved in the debate. Hadhrat Ahmad's as final question bore yet another evidence of the fact that the eventual outcome of the prophecy against Athim was to be 'a strong proof that the Holy Prophet, Hadhrat Muhammadsa, whom. Athim had the audacity to revile was a true prophet. '. At this stage, one would beseech Abdul Hafeez to reflect upon the consequences of his assertion that this prophecy against. Abdullah Athim was not fulfilled in the light of the fact that it was to be a strong proof of the truth of Hadhrat Muhammadsa whom Athim had so numerously insulted. Is this pir of Gujjo so engrossed in his prejudice against Hadhrat Ahmad as that he is 60. Ahmad, [Hadhrat] Mirza Ghulam. Jang e Muqaddas, pp. 209/10; Ruhani Khazain, vol. 6, pp. 291/92 61. Ibid. , p. 211; Ruhani Khazain, vol. 6, p. 293 295