Three in One — Page 336
entire doctrine to be so false that he believed that the sense of human purity condemns it. He stated: 'There is no other doctrine as false as the doctrine of the transmigration of souls, inasmuch as its basis is false. Its falsehood is established by observation; a sense of human purity condemns it; and it is the duty of every godly person to condemn it on account of its repudiation of Divine power. . Hadhrat Ahmadas also declared that the 'doctrine of the transmigration of soul offends against purity. 199 24. And finally, in his last allegation against Hadhrat Mirza. Ghulam Ahmadas, the author of Two in One alleges that he declared the Holy Quran to, God forbid, be full of filthy words 100 which is a blatant lie since Hadhrat Ahmadas did not, either in Izalah Auham or any of his other works, ever make such a statement. One challenges Abdul Hafeez to prove that there is any such sentence contained in any of Hadhrat. Ahmad's as books. . This, in brief, is the reality of the twenty four alleged citations claimed by the pir of Gujjo to have been cited from Hadhrat. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's as books. As blatantly evident, Abdul. Hafeez has caused such subreption of the Ahmadiyya Muslim. Community's literature as does not behove a believer. In fact, it would even put the advocates of the devil to shame. Yet, this petty pir of Gujjo has the audacity to take exception to the appellation of a liar, a disbeliever an enemy stated on the cover of the Mubahala. If, after what he has done, he is not a liar, a disbeliever and an enemy - all three in one - then what, if one may ask is he? 98. Ahmad, [Hadhrat] Mirza Ghulam. Nassem e Dawat, f/n. 1, p. 76; Ruhani Khazain, vol. 19, p. 441 99. Ibid. , p. 78; Ruhani Khazain, vol. 19, p. 443 100. Shah, Syed Abdul Hafeez. Two in One, p. 52 336