Three in One — Page 326
a long and drawn discussion in relation to this objection raised by Abdul Hafeez. But, to illustrate that Hadhrat Ahmad'sas description of what is meant by various signs in the vision of the Holy Prophets is positively correct, one would merely beg a question of the author of Two in One that if the Christian priests are not the Dadjaal spoken of in this Hadeeth, then what was the purpose of Hadhrat Muhammadsa advising Muslims: 'Who ever commits to memory the first ten verses of Surah al. Kahf will be immune from the Dadjaal. ' 157. In yet another Hadeeth, Hadhrat Muhammadsa advised Muslims that if ever confronted with the Dadjaal: 'Whoever recites the last ten verses of Surah Al Kahf will be safe from the trials of the Dadjaal. ' 158. If Abdul Hafeez has a grain of intelligence, which one doubts he possesses, he would certainly be able to decipher the wisdom contained in this advise of the Prophet of Islamsa. But since this pir of Gujjo is a personified Dabbat al Ard himself, one should not expect him to know any better. 9. In his next charge, the author of Two in One states that. Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as stated that Hadhrat Jesusas 'used to practice mesmerism and was an expert in it 159 suggesting that he meant to belittle Hadhrat Jesusas. Yet, when one reads Hadhrat Ahmad's as original statement in the context of the larger discussion, one does not find anything objectionable in it. He stated that: 'It must also be understood that healing ailments and transferring the heat of one's body into another are all parts of the art of mesmerism. Men of this type have always existed who could cure leprosy and other such ailments. All those 57. Ibid. 58. Ibid. 59. Shah, Syed Abdul Hafeez. Two in One, p. 51 326