Three in One — Page 311
later narrators. 112. Secondly, the absence of any mention of Hadhrat Ibne Abbasta attributing any such meaning and explanation of Surah Zilzal to. Hadhrat Muhammadsa in the most authentic collections of. Hadeeth, including those of Hadhrat Imam Bukharith and. Hadhrat Imam Muslim is in itself an indication of the fact that no such meaning and explanation of the Surah has been traced by Isnad to Hadhrat Ibn Abbas and consequently to the. Prophet of Islam³ª. Its inclusion in later works could, therefore, be of suspect origin and hence does not conclusively establish that according to Hadhrat Ibne Abbasa, Hadhrat Muhammad sa ever explained the Surah in a manner in which the later scholars of Islam believed that he did. 113 га. While on the question of such a report being mentioned in later works, it is rather amazing that people like Abdul Hafeez should insist upon the authenticity of this report attributed to. Hadhrat Muhammadsa on the grounds that it has been 'mentioned in Tafseer Ibne Kaseer and Dur e Mansoor etc. and books of Allama Sayooti. ¹¹³ One states this in view of the fact that whenever expedient, these mullah criticise the reliability of the works of both these scholars. In fact, they even reject the authenticity of several Ahadeeth attributed to Hadhrat. Muhammads and considered genuine by Hadhrat Ibne Kathirth and Hadhrat Hafiz al Suyutith, who incidentally is the author of. Durre Manthur also. For instance, they censure Hadhrat Ibne. Kathir for expressing such opinions in relation to the authenticity of Ahadeeth as, to quote one opponent of the. Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, 'does not hold water. 14 This particular graduate from Medina University also criticises. Hadhrat Imam Suyutish for accepting Hadeeth with weak Isnad 15 and from weak and unknown reporters as well as unreliable authorities. " They also deny the validity of some Ahadeeth reported by Hadhrat Hafiz Jalal al Din 'Abd al Rahman 16 12. Siddiqui, Dr. Muhammad Zubayr. Hadeeth Literature, p. 34 13. Shah, Syed Abdul Hafeez. Two in One, p. 50 14. Hasan, Suhaib. Criticism of Hadith Among Muslims with Reference to Sunan Ibn Maja, p. 226 15. Ibid. , p. 164 16. Ibid. ,. P. 165 311 17. Ibid. , p. 194