Three in One — Page 299
DIALOGUE WITH. MAULVI SANAULLAH AMRITSARI. Finally, Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's as dialogue with. Maulvi Sanaullah Amritsari, and its subsequent outcome is another episode which Abdul Hafeez alleges rebounded on him. . He states that Hadhrat Ahmad as predicted Sanaullah's death within his life but the mullah died in 1947. 70 How much truth is this pir of Gujjo uttering in this statement shall be presently illustrated. . Like many of his contemporary mullah, Sanaullah was passionately opposed to Hadhrat Ahmadas and never missed an opportunity to revile him. In 1897, Hadhrat Ahmadas wrote a book, Anjam e Athim wherein he challenged some religious leaders of India who called him a liar and a pretender, to a. Mubahala and Sanaullah happened to be one whose name was included in this list. However, he initially ignored this challenge until 1902, when, under some pressure from his colleagues, he took the initiative and challenged Hadhrat Ahmadas to a counter. Mubahala as Abdul Hafeez is seen to have done in his book. Two in One. . As soon as Hadhrat Ahmadas received word that the maulvi had issued such a challenge, he signified his acceptance and stated that 'he had seen the announcement of Sanaullah in which he has claimed that he has a sincere desire that he and. Hadhrat Ahmadas should pray that the one of them who is in the wrong should die in the lifetime of the other. 71 However, since he was aware of the cowardly disposition of the mullah, he stated that Sanaullah had made a good proposal and he hoped that the maulvi would stand by it. Hadhrat Ahmadªs then proceeded to state that if Sanaullah 'is sincere in his challenge that the one who is untruthful should die before the truthful one, then surely Sanaullah will die first. 172 70. Shah, Syed Abdul Hafeez. Two in One, p. 42 71. Ahmad, [Hadhrat] Mirza Ghulam. Ijaz Ahmadi, p. 14; Ruhani Khazin, vol. 19, p. 121/22 72. Ibid. , Ijaz Ahmadi, p. 14; Ruhani Khazin, vol. 19, p. 122 299