Three in One — Page 247
In the course of this publication against the Ahmadiyya Muslim. Community, its author has been shown to have often repeated a prayer that the wrath of God descend upon the liar and slanderer and this allegation by Abdul Hafeez is yet another fulfilment of his prayer which should indicate to the world that he has been exposed as one for the world to recognise. For instance, at this juncture of his book Two in One, he asks as to 'who was Hadhrat Ahmad as and what were his objectives' and then proceeds to state that 'once again Hadhrat Ahmad's as writings provide an insight to this. "4 The conclusion which he then derives from the literature of the Ahmadiyya Muslim. Community which apparently provides an insight to this question is that he was a seedling of the British. 5. However, what this lying and manipulating pir of Gujjo seems to have forgotten is that when he attempted to manipulate the. Ahmadiyya Muslim literature to answer his own question as to 'who was Hadhrat Ahmadas, he cited the following passage from Hadhrat Sahibzada Mirza Bashir Ahmad's biography of. Hadhrat Ahmadas, titled Seerat ul Mahdi: 'The British confiscated our family lands and fixed honorary pension of Rs. 700/- only per year in the form of cash which was reduced to Rs. 180/- only at the death of my Grandfather and stopped completely after my uncle's [Father's elder brother] death. "6. Now, if all these allegations made by the author of Two in One are correct then would he explain as to why should the British. Government fix an honorary pension of seven hundred rupees to. Hadhrat Ahmad's as father which it subsequently reduces to a mere one hundred and eighty rupees when his elder brother becomes the lord of the manor and yet when a person whom it allegedly 'short lists and finds most suitable' takes control of the affairs of the family on the death of his elder brother, it completely stops this pension and pays no consideration thereafter? 4. ibid. , p. 87 5. Ibid. , pp. 87/89 6. Ibid. , p. 9 247