Three in One — Page 200
the noble Quran has been recorded as: كل من عليها فان ويبقى وجع ربك والجلال والاكرام. PHOTOCOPY OF THE PASSAGE IN HADHRAT AHMAD'S IZALAH AUHAM, P. 136;. RUHANI KHAZAIN, VOL. 3, P. 149 i. e. , Kullu man 'alay-haa faan: Wa yabqaa Wajhu Rabbika Zul-Jalaali wal-'Ikraam. It is therefore thoroughly dishonest to manipulate a perfectly normal human error as evidence of intentional distortion. However, if it is still insisted that such human errors are unacceptable and therefore, a perfectly justifiable evidence of intentional distortion, then Abdul Hafeez himself stands guilty of the offence of subjecting the noble Quran to alteration since the passage of Surah al Rahman which he cites in his book reads: (كل من عليها فان ويبقى وجه ربك ذو الجلال والاكرام ). COPY OF PASSAGE FROM SURAH AL RAHMAN CITED BY ABDUL HAFEEZ. IN HIS BOOK TWO IN ONE, P. 24 i. e. , Kullu man 'alay-haa faan. Wa yabqaa Wajhu Rabbika Nul-Jalaali wal-'Ikraam. Hence, while the original passage in the noble. Quran contains the word u Zul-Jalaali between. Rabbika and Syl, wal-Ikraam, Abdul Hafeez has substituted the Arabic alphabet za with nun and therefore recorded 3 j. J Nul-Jalaali instead of 9 Zul-Jalaali. Therefore, while he accuses Hadhrat Ahmadas of subjecting the Quran to alteration by adding or removing some words he is seen to be himself guilty of removing the word Zul-Jalaali and adding NulJalaali. How does he then propose to justify himself in the presence of God in view of his own statement that 'alteration in the Holy Quran is an abominable sin and the one who is responsible for it will be given severe punishment on the Day 7. Shah, Syed Abdul Hafeez. Two in One, p. 2 200