Three in One — Page 190
honour of God Almighty's blessed angels and apostles as well as the consorts and companions of God's messengers? Would he state that these Satanic allegations of the devil's advocate establish the guilt of those so accused? If not, then why does he maintain double standards in relation to the allegations made by perverts of a similar disposition against Hadhrat Mirza Bashir ud Din Mahmud Ahmada. Is this the Islam to which Abdul. Hafeez so numerously invites the Ahmadiyya Muslim. Community?. As regards the question of the Mubahala, a certain Mistri. Abdul Karim who had become involved with a group which broke away from the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community to challenge the Institution of Khilafat within the Ahmadiyya. Muslim Movement engaged in a dialogue with Hadhrat Mirza. Bashir ud Din Mahmud Ahmada in response to which the latter put himself under solemn oath and concluded: 'Now that I have taken the solemn path, let whoever believes he is justified in his opposition to me in this behalf, come forward to take a similar oath, on his part, and then leave the matter to be decided by Allah. 1282. But Mistri Abdul Karim did not have the courage to accept this straightforward Mubahala invitation by the second Caliph,. Hadhrat Mirza Bashir ud Din Mahmud Ahmadra, just as this pir from Gujjo, despite his numerous allegations against the. Ahmadiyya Muslim Community has not the courage to accept the fourth Caliph, Hadhrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad's ra straightforward Mubahala invitation. . Since Abdul Hafeez has not been able to provide any conclusive evidence to indict the leadership of the Ahmadiyya. Muslim Community with his false charges of serious moral corruption, he has given wide publicity to the allegations made by Abdur Rahman Misri's son Bashir Misri 283 who was, along 282. Ahmad, [Hadhrat] Mirza Bashir ud Din Mahmud. Iawab Mubahala, p. 10 283. Shah, Syed Abdul Hafeez. Two in One, pp. 83/5 190