Three in One — Page 118
that a man can become spiritually pregnant by the spirit of God and thereafter be born from within one's self? If not, then would. Abdul Hafeez not be giving evidence of his singular bias against. Hadhrat Ahmadas and therefore his enmity towards him? Why then does he take exception to the appellation of an enemy on the cover page of the Mubahala?. While the author of Two in One is considering these questions, one would bring to his notice that this entire concept of being named Mary and the soul of Jesus being infused in one and one being born as Ibne Mariam, initially recorded and explained in. Braheen e Ahmadiyya by Hadhrat Ahmadas was regarded as being within the accepted conventions of Islamic thought by none other than Abdul Hafeez's patron saint - Maulvi Sanaullah. Amritsari who having studied Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam. Ahmad's as explanation of this concept, stated: 'According to the approved conventions the meanings of the explanations given by Mirza Sahib should be accepted as correct. 159. Since Maulvi Sanaullah Amritsari never claimed to have experienced a phenomenon of such spiritual excellence, it would be unfair to ask Abdul Hafeez if he would consider it proper to depict him in his caricatures. Yet, he is seen by his aforementioned statement to subscribe to the feasibility of this phenomenon taking place and hence one would only ask him if he would now care to denounce his own spiritual mentor for subscribing to a ridiculous idea and also accuse him of madness? Furthermore, since Maulvi Sanaullah Amritsari accepted the Islamic basis of this concept and Abdul Hafeez does not, does that not make the author of Two in One a disbeliever in Islamic concepts. Why then does he take exception to the appellation of a disbeliever on the cover page of the. Mubahala? A liar he has sufficiently been proved in the preceding chapters. Why then should he take exception to these three appellations being applied to him. 59. Amritsari, Maulvi Sanaullah. Illhaamaat e Mirza, p. 5 118