Three in One — Page 101
the son of Mary by the Deoband scholars. 183 '. The question which one need ask the author of Two in One is that if, in view of Hadhrat Ahmad's as claim that he had been named Mary and called Jesus he considers Hadhrat Ahmadas to be suffering from hallucinations and an imbecile 184, then what does he think of the mental state of all these saints and scholars of the ummah whose pronouncements in relation to themselves or their spiritual predecessors hardly differ from those of. Hadhrat Ahmadas? If, in view of Hadhrat Ahmad's as statement that he was given the title of Krsna and the king of the Aryas whose advent the Hindus awaited, Abdul Hafeez considers him to be suffering from hallucinations and alleges that he was mad 185 then what does he think of all these other saints and scholars of the ummah who claimed such a large number of appellations for themselves or else attributed these to their spiritual mentors? Would he allege that they all suffered from hallucinations and would he denounce them as mad men? One would also enquire of him as to what extent do these saints and scholars of the ummah who claimed such a large number of appellations for themselves or their spiritual mentors fit within. Abdul Hafeez's realm of instability and versatility 186? Would he then caricature cartoons of these revered personalities in the next edition of his book Two in One as he has done in this edition 187? If not, then would his singular prejudice against. Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas not prove his enmity towards him? Why then should he take exception to the title of an enemy being applied to him? 188 184. Shah, Syed Abdul Hafeez. Two in One, p. 2 188. Ibid. , p. 5 187. Ibid. 183. Ibid. Marisiyya 185. Ibid. , p. 2 186. Ibid. , p. 3 101