Three in One — Page 95
this, one would be justified, yet once again, in asserting that the author of Two in One has not only given sufficient evidence of his being a personified liar but his prayer: 'O God! Which ever party is a liar and slanderer, bring down your [sic] anger upon him in one week '144 has been heard and he has been proved a liar and a slanderer by God Almighty. And so has his other prayer been heard where he stated that if he is: 'wrongly accusing them [i. e. , Ahmadis] or writing for worldly gain, O Allah trap every liar and accuser with Your curse and reveal such signs which will decide between true and false. " +145. All praise belong to Allah! He has revealed such a sign of. Abdul Hafeez's falsehood that He has caused this personified liar and accuser to attribute yet another claim to Hadhrat. Ahmadas in his book Two in One 146 of which if Abdul Hafeez was to spend his entire mortal life, he would not find substantiative evidence. This incidentally is the standard of the full honesty of this pir of Gujjjo with which he proposes to illustrate to Hadhrat Mirza Tahir Ahmaday and the Ahmadiyya. Muslim Community as to who is a liar. 147 Yet he takes exception to the title of a liar on the cover page of the Mubahala challenge 148 when it aptly applies to him. Need one say more or is it now not evident that Abdul Hafeez is a personified liar? If he wishes to claim that he is not and this conclusion is unjustified, then let him provide proof that Hadhrat Ahmadas ever claimed to have been invested with this appellation. If he can, then the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community will stand corrected and if not then the author of Two in One stands condemned as a liar. 144. Ibid. , 19 145. Ibid. , p. 52 146. Ibid. , p. 3 147. Ibid. , p. 5 148. Ibid. 95