Three in One — Page 77
Ahmadas, proposing the same concept be construed to suggest that the son to be born of him was claimed to be God in Person and therefore, he had to be the father of God?. Although Hadhrat Ahmad's as critics falsely accuse him for such alleged blasphemy and sacrilege of the Divine, this does not alter the fact that a direct reference to the actual passage of his book from whence this revelation has been misquoted indicates that he did not at any point in time state that the son to be born would be the manifestation of Elevation and Truth - Elevation and Truth being suggested as meaning God Almighty on account of the use of capital letters by his adversary. ” On the contrary, the actual passage in his original work reads: 'We give thee glad tidings of a humble boy who will be characterised with truth and grandeur as if God Himself has descended from heaven. " 162. The fact that the aforementioned translation of the revelation under discussion is positively the correct one is verified by its citation in another hostile publication which quotes it to read: 'He gives you tidings of a boy, the exponent of truth and spiritual altitude, as if God descended from Heaven. 163. How could these words be construed to imply that according to this revelation, the son to be born is God in Person and therefore, Hadhrat Ahmad as would certainly be the father of. God particularly when the adversaries themselves admit that all that is being stated by this Divine revelation is that the child shall be 'the exponent of truth and spiritual altitude as if God had descended from heaven. '. This revelation which has been subjected to such cruel subreption did not at any point in time propose to attribute. Divinity to Hadhrat Ahmad'sas son nor did Hadhrat Ahmadas 61. Irfani, Abu al Bashir. The Cunning Chameleon, p. 13 62. Ahmad, [Hadhrat] Mirza Ghulam. Anjam Atham, p. 62; Ruhani Khazain, vol. xii, p. 62 63. Zaheer, Ehsan Elahi. Qadiyaniat, ed. May 1973, p. 116 77