Three in One — Page 331
15. The author of Two in One also alleges that in his book. Braheen e Ahmadiyya, page 558, Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam. Ahmadas stated that the 'Bait ul Fiqr at Qadian is like the Haram e Ka'aba. 178 This allegation is yet another blatant lie since no where therein is any such statement recorded by Hadhrat. Ahmadªs. Incidentally, it might interest Abdul Hafeez to know that while the Braheen e Ahmadiyya is of the 1880/1884 period, the Bait ul Fiqr at Qadian is of a much later date. How could. Hadhrat Ahmadas have made such a statement in relation to it when it did not exist at the time of writing the book in which he is allegedly stated to have made such a statement?. sa 16. In his next charge, Abdul Hafeez alleges that according to a pamphlet Minaret al Maseeh, the Quranic verses Surah 17. 1 in relation to Hadhrat Muhammad's journey from Masjid al. Haram to Masjid al Aqsa is stated to apply, in its literal and real sense, to the mosque built by Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad'sas father at Qadian. ” However, when one refers to the opinions expressed by the leadership of the Ahmadiyya Muslim. Community itself, rather then claiming that the said Quranic verse is a literal and real application of the mosque in Qadian, they have opined that: 79 'The vision may also be taken as referring to a spiritual journey of the Holy Prophets to a distant land in some future time. 180. How much of a difference is there between the opinion attributed to the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community by Abdul. Hafeez and the one held by its leadership is clearly evident from the above statement. 17. The pir of Gujjo also alleges that on pages 421/22 of Izalah. Auham, Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas stated that 'Hadhrat 78. Shah, Syed Abdul Hafeez. Two in One, p. 51 79. Ibid. 80. Ahmad, [Hadhrat] Mirza Bashir ud Din. Tafsir Kabir, English Edition, vol. 3, p 1411 331