Three in One — Page 282
distressed. He stated that when he read this statement by the dissident family, he: 'found it full of such abusive language which could rend the bosom of heaven asunder. Thereupon, I bolted my doors and supplicated my Lord, the Bountiful, prostrating myself before. Him and saying: My Lord, help Thy servant and humiliate Thy enemies. Respond to me, O Lord, respond to me! How long will they mock Thee and Thy Messenger sa? How long will they call Thy Book false and abuse Thy Messengersª? I beseech. Thee of Thine Mercy, O Ever Living, Self Subsisting Helper!123. Consequently, God responded to Hadhrat Ahmad's as earnest supplications with the declaration: 'I have observed their misconduct and wickedness and I shall soon destroy them through different kinds of calamities and you will see how I deal with them,. It should now be evident that Hadhrat Ahmad's as supplicated. God not because of any personal motivation but because these enemies of the Faith denied the existence of God, reviled His. Messenger and abused His sacred Word. It should also be evident that God responded to Hadhrat Ahmad's as supplications not in response to his request that He save Hadhrat Ahmad's as personal honour but the honour of his Lord, God Almighty, His. Messenger, Hadhrat Muhammadsa and His Word, The Glorious. Quran. Hence, for Abdul Hafeez to argue against the fulfilment of this prophecy is tantamount to suggesting that, God forbid,. Allah did not care much of His honour and that of His. Messenger, Hadhrat Muhammadsa and His Book, the Glorious. Quran or that God forbid, if He did, then this dissident family succeeded in frustrating the will of God. This conclusion is deduced from the fact that the document which some of 23. Ahmad, [Hadhrat] Mirza Ghulam. Ayenae Kamalat e Islam; Ruhani Khazain, vol. 5, P. 569 24. Ahmad, [Hadhrat] Mirza Ghulam. Ayenae Kamalat e Islam; Ruhani Khazain, vol. 5, p. 569 282