Three in One — Page 167
It is translated by non Ahmadiyya Muslim scholars of repute as: '61. And whoso disputeth with thee concerning him, after the knowledge which hath come unto thee, say [unto him]: Come!. We will summon our sons and your sons, and our women and your women, and ourselves and yourselves, then we will pray humbly [to our Lord] and [solemnly] invoke the curse of Allah upon those who lie. '. ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF VERSE NO. 61 OF SURAH 3. BY MUHAMMED MARMADUKE PICKTHALL. VIDE. THE HOLY QUR'AAN. PUBLISHED BY IDARA ISHA'AT E DINIYAT [P] LTD. , NEW DELHI, PP. 62/63. Now, the question which one need ask this pseudo a'lim of. Gujjo is, where in this verse of Mubahala did the Prophet of. Allah sa specify the time and place for the Mubahala? Is this then not a case of either intentional misrepresentation of the Quran by the author of Two in One or else his sheer ignorance of the. Quranic text?. There are several other such instances in Abdul Hafeez's book which expose his ignorance of Islamic teachings, as for instance, his statement that 'Satan is a teacher of angels. 1201 Only a man like him could make such a statement since he appears to have been taught by the accursed Satan and in holding such obnoxious views in relation to God Almighty's Divinely guided and taught messengers, the angels, he probably believes that he too can thereby identify himself with them. However, while his meagre knowledge of Islamic theology has been sufficiently exposed in the preceding pages, the following pages should also expose his ignorance of history. . The essence of the objection which Abdul Hafeez has raised against Hadhrat Ahmadas in this instance is that he 'neither completed his education nor a course of mufti or even give his hand into the hands of a spiritual guide to be called an a'lim or be qualified as a mufti. ' However, if he finds this objectionable, 201. Ibid. , p. 40 167