Refutation of the Allegation of Insult to Jesus Christ — Page 31
31 technique of counter accusation. In this technique, however, the element of truth, reasoning and rationality were very prominent. Moreover, whatever he stated was based upon the authentic writings of the Christians. When padres felt defeated, they started alleging that (God-forbid) Hadrat Mirz a Sahib was being insulting to, and contemptuous of, Hadrat I s a as. Hadrat Mirz a Sahib responded to this false allegation as follows: " lIJ A : ̂ɫ/ل ا Vɵ / 5 kż/ 5 l a ñ ƙ a ñ ƙ Z lIJ ͇̈́ 7 ̈́ ͉ /̞ Z اbƏ lIJ ب a Ȋ lIJ jƯ آپ ͅbاب }̈́ ĕ͆ Ɖ͇͌ /ï ام a اů ؤہ A: jƯ آپ ͉͌͏اؤر 6 lư /mbƩ >Ǒ͈͌͌ͅ A: ã êC ê ë ͉͇ Ǽ Ƈ̈́ ". 76 “You say that I have, as if, insulted Hadrat Masi h (the Messiah) to some extent by using an abusive word with reference to him. This is a misunderstanding of yours. I believe Hadrat Mas ih to be a true prophet, a chosen one and beloved servant of God. What I said in retaliation was in keeping with your own faith. Hence 76 >ˏ ` ú ا a رؤ/~k ɭس. ]Ǒ͇ ͏ّ̈́̈́ͅ Ǝِ͇̈́ ۶ ۱۷۰