Refutation of the Allegation of Insult to Jesus Christ — Page 7
7 merely to incite negative feelings. Those Muslim scholars did not insult the honoured person of Hadrat ‘ I sa as. They only reflected upon the mythical person presented in the Gospels and accepted by Christians as Jesus. That particular person had nothing to do with ‘ I s a bin Maryam as , the prophet of All a h, mentioned in the Holy Qur’an. For example, following are a few quotations of the Muslim scholars of the time: 1. Maulaw i Ra h matull a h Muh a jir Mecc i , a learned scholar among the Sunn i Muslims, in his book ‘Iz a lah Auh a m’, writes: " اث h ͇ ǰ را êë ȑو اث h ͇ ǰ a اǖŔ 9 9 ƍ ƍ͈͈ Ǘ ð͆ Ǒ اm̈́̈́ 6 ̈́ ê C Aا : ͈ز ^͆ ǑƆ ا اA/¡ /̄̈́ | ن ƪ͌ _ mز/ȅ͈̈́Ǘ Ƅ b̐د ͈ؤ | راb /بǑ آ͉͇̈́ Ǯ̈́ 9 ن j͇ǣ ˫̈́ ̈́ Ǒ͈ Ǒ ا̈́̈́ 6 ͌در ƪ >Ǒ bʣ A/¡ اث h ͇ ǰ bǷ͈̈́ 6 ͈ ǑƆ 9 ƍ͉ ˬ. 6 " (i) “Most of the miracles attributed to Jesus cannot be considered as miracles because magicians could also perform such feats. That is why the Jews do not accept him as a prophet and they consider his miracles as those of a magician. ” 7 " ê C >Ǒ /ƃ h ɲ͈ ار h اĎ m>Ǒ b @ ͈ 9 ͈̈́͆ ¤͈̈́ ǣǿ j iم ا ê Ǡ˦ ȅŰ͈ ï ƕ /نm/Ǒ ͇͈͇در 6 j ؤ >m>m/ƃ̈́̈́ 6 ê Ǻ̈́9 Æ ۱۲۹ 7 page 129