Malfuzat – Volume II — Page 211
211 existence of Parmeshwar? On the one hand, when these people are sullied by the impurity of not know- ing God—how could one expect that they would be able to expound the ways in which to behold and manifest God? Then, on the other hand, what a grievous wrong they commit by suggesting that souls return in all creatures to pay for their actions, sometimes in the form of a pig, sometimes as a dog or a cat, etc. Transmigration of Souls In this context, an issue that arises is that if someone’s mother passed away when they were still a child, and the mother was born again somewhere else, when both the child and mother reached an age of maturity, and if they were married for example, engaged in intercourse and then had children, this would be an utterly immodest thing, and lays the foundation for despicable indecency—this religion proves to be most shameless indeed. Their Parmeshwar has given no catalogue that would indicate the signs by which one could recognise their own mother or sister. In truth, the Veda was re- sponsible, that where on the one hand it invented this doctrine which cuts at the root of chastity and morality, if it had any common sense or insight, it ought to have outlined the signs by which a follower of the Arya faith would have the key in their hand, making it possible to refrain from such relations. It was inevitable, however, that the Vedic teaching be scarred on its forehead by this flaw so that in every era, those who reflect could recognise its falsehood. On the one hand, these people are so extreme that they will not marry the rela- tives of their maternal grandmothers or even those of their grandmother’s great grandmother. Yet, on the other hand, they have no argument for why they will marry their mother and sister. On the one hand they will stay thousands of miles away, yet on the other hand, they will bring home their own mother or sister in marriage. No religion is so sunk in darkness as this one. It is unfortunate that their Parmeshwar flung them into impurity and then did not care to give them a catalogue that would indicate which specific donkey or ox they should not use because a certain animal was a previous relative, or that a woman with such and such signs should not be married because she is actually a biological mother, or grandmother, aunt, sister, or niece who has been reborn and come again. In re- ality, the followers of the Arya faith are themselves excused, because it is Par- meshwar himself who is guilty of this entire injustice, as he failed to provide a