With Love to Muhammad (sa) - The Khatam-un-Nabiyyin — Page 76
76 With Love to Muhammad sa the Kh ā tam-un-Nabiyy ī n the official argument of Ahmad ī Muslims 64. His reasoning is that he wants to avoid the straw man fallacy but this is a very strange excuse! By choosing to present that argument, his motive is quite the opposite of what he is saying. The Ahmadiyya Muslim argument is presented by him in a form that can easily be refuted. Although the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jam ā ‘at is not obliged to answer such ridiculous allegations that attempt to discredit its beliefs, we will respond regardless for the benefit of the reader. After making a lengthy discussion, Farhan Khan summarizes the Ahmad ī belief as follows: [No more laws from 5:3] + [No more prophets from 33:41] = [No more law-bearing Prophets] This is a dishonest and pathetic attempt to discredit Ahmadiyya Muslim beliefs. At no time in its entire history has the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jam ā ‘at accepted that 33:41 states that there are “No more prophets. ” If Farhan Khan was being intellectually honest , he should have chosen to point out which Ahmad ī literature or which Ahmad ī scholar has stated that there are “no more prophets” according to 33:41. Nevertheless, for the sake of argument, his rebuttal is quoted below:. . . Suppose a grocery store owner was checking his inventory and realized he had overstocked on apples and sweets. Immediately, he put two requests to his local supplier: not to deliver any more apples or any more sweets. Next, consider these two statements from the perspective of the supplier. He has been told (1) not 64 Khan, With Love , 30