With Love to Muhammad (sa) - The Khatam-un-Nabiyyin — Page xx
vii Foreword Intellectual differences are found in every religion of the world. Some are based on truth, while others on falsehood, but they remain intellectual differences whether or not someone’s belief is based on it. However, the subject of the finality of the prophethood of the Holy Prophet sa regarding which non- Ahmad ī Muslims disagree with the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jam ā ‘at has left the form of intellectual discussion and assumed the shape of mischief and falsehood. This is because a malicious allegation is made against the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jam ā ‘at that it considers Hazrat Mirz ā Ghul ā m Ahmad Q ā di ā n ī as a Prophet in the sense that goes against the message of the following statements: a بَ]ْدِی a َّ َِبH a ﻻَ [There is no Prophet after me] ِ اﻻHَْْبiَِاء a ُ آخِر a ِّHِا [I am the last of the Prophets] In other words, it is alleged that a new community and a new religion have been established by the abrogation of the prophethood of Hazrat Muhammad Mustaf ā Kh ā tamul Anbiy ā sa. In this way, regarding this issue, false and baseless allegations have been levelled against the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jam ā ‘at and fictitious beliefs have been attributed to it. This is despite the fact that those who spread this mischief and attribute falsehood to the community hold the belief of the coming of a Prophet after the Holy Prophet sa themselves. Their elders have written exactly what the community believes! It is a proven fact – attested by the Isl ā mic books that have been published in the