With Love to Muhammad (sa) - The Khatam-un-Nabiyyin — Page 117
Had ī th of Hazrat ‘Al ī ra and L ā Nabiyya Ba‘ad ī 117 Here the word ب]دی [ ba’ad ī ] is not in the context of زGاH a ب]دMت [ after his time ] because Hazrat H ā r ū n as did not outlive Hazrat M ū s ā as. Hence, the implied conclusion was not for a period after the Holy Prophet sa for Hazrat ‘Al ī ra. As a result, there was no reason to make the exception of a period after the Holy Prophet sa for Hazrat ‘Al ī ra. Farhan Khan did not write his chapter in criticism of Isl ā m Ahmadiyya alone. He wrote it also in criticism of Hazrat Sh ā h Waliull ā h Mohaddas Dehlav ī , who was one of the greatest scholars of had ī th in the history of Isl ā m. The problem is that Farhan Khan continues to insist upon his meanings in order to believe in the coming back of Hazrat ‘ Ī s ā as as a Prophet after the Holy Prophet Muhammad sa. He should learn that Hazrat ‘ Ī s ā as has died according to the Holy Qur’ ā n and this has been proven in the chapter entitled The Death of Hazrat ‘ Ī s ā as. Question for Farhan Khan: 1. Does he think that the conclusions drawn by Hazrat Sh ā h Waliull ā h Mohaddas Dehlav ī rh are wrong or just lengthy reinterpretation 108 ? If the answer is ‘no’, why does he not accept it? 108 Khan, With Love , Page 19