With Love to Muhammad (sa) - The Khatam-un-Nabiyyin — Page 112
112 With Love to Muhammad sa the Kh ā tam-un-Nabiyy ī n Khan’s points. He misrepresents Ahmadiyya Muslim beliefs by describing them in the following words: In this usage, the word ba‘ad does not mean after. According to Lane’s Lexicon, page 225, the word ba‘ad also means behind. Based on the usage of the Prophet, one can see that the actual meaning of this statement is no Prophet behind me in the sense that the Prophet Muhammad was departing to Tab ū k and was not leaving behind a Prophet, as M ū s ā did when he left Har ū n behind. 102 This is another one of those dishonesties of Farhan Khan! Ahmad ī Muslims did not just open the dictionary and chose to take a secondary meaning of ba‘ad in order to conform the meaning of the had ī th to their understanding. This is a blatant lie against Ahmadiyya Muslim beliefs! First, as shown in the previous chapter, this understanding is in absolute accordance with the understanding of Hazrat Sh ā h Waliull ā h Mohaddes Dehlav ī rh , universally acknowledged as the Mujaddid of the 12th century, who writes in Qurat-ul-Ain ī n F ī Tafs ī l Al-Shaikhain , Page 602: It must be clearly understood that the object of this had ī th is to highlight the appointment of Hazrat ‘Al ī ra to act in the place of or as an in charge of the region while the Holy Prophet sa was to be absent from Medina during his expedition to Tab ū k. It was also done to highlight Hazrat ‘Al ī ’s ra resemblance to Hazrat H ā r ū n as when Hazrat M ū s ā as had journeyed to 102 Khan, With Love , Page 17